Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Asphalt Evaporation Loss Test: Standards, Procedure, and Applications

The asphalt evaporation loss test is a standardized laboratory method that measures the mass loss and hardening of bituminous binders after heating at 163°C for five hours, simulating the short-term aging that occurs during hot-mix asphalt production and pavement construction. By quantifying the evaporation loss and the penetration ratio of the residue, the test helps engineers evaluate binder durability and verify compliance with specifications such as ASTM D6, AASHTO T 47, and GB/T 11964. This article provides a complete technical guide covering the test principle, sample requirements, apparatus, step-by-step procedure, calculations, and typical applications.

Technical Overview

The asphalt evaporation loss test, also known as the loss-on-heating test, is a fundamental laboratory method used to evaluate the thermal stability and short-term aging resistance of asphalt (bitumen) binders. During the production, storage, transport, and paving of hot-mix asphalt, the binder is exposed to elevated temperatures in thin films in the presence of air. Under these conditions, light volatile fractions evaporate and oxidation reactions occur, changing both the mass and the consistency of the binder.

In this test, a 50 g specimen of asphalt is placed in a shallow flat-bottomed dish and heated in a ventilated oven at 163°C ± 1°C for five hours. The specimen is weighed before and after heating to determine the evaporation loss, and the penetration of the residue can then be measured to calculate the penetration ratio (retained penetration). A binder that shows low mass loss and a high penetration ratio demonstrates better resistance to hardening during construction and early service life.

Reference Standards

  • ASTM D6 – Standard Test Method for Loss on Heating of Oil and Asphaltic Compounds
  • AASHTO T 47 – Standard Method of Test for Loss on Heating of Oil and Asphaltic Compounds
  • GB/T 11964 – Chinese national standard for the determination of evaporation loss of asphalt
  • JTG E20, method T 0608 – Chinese highway industry standard for bitumen and bituminous mixture testing
  • Related aging test methods: ASTM D1754 (Thin-Film Oven Test, TFOT) and ASTM D2872 (Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test, RTFOT)

Significance of the Test

Excessive evaporation loss and hardening during construction reduce binder flexibility and can lead to premature cracking, raveling, and reduced fatigue life of the pavement. The evaporation loss test therefore serves as a key acceptance criterion in asphalt specifications and as a research tool for comparing the aging resistance of different binders, crude sources, and additives. Results from accredited third-party laboratories are commonly used for product certification, delivery acceptance, and mix design verification.

Testing Samples

Road (Paving) Petroleum Asphalt

Penetration-graded paving binders, such as No. 50, No. 70, No. 90, and No. 110 grades, are the most frequently tested materials. For these products, both the mass loss on heating and the penetration ratio of the residue are typically specified requirements.

Polymer-Modified and Specialty Binders

SBS-modified asphalt, high-viscosity modified asphalt, and hard paving grades can also be evaluated. Because the static evaporation method may allow a surface skin to form that limits further exposure, dynamic methods such as the RTFOT are often preferred for modified binders; nevertheless, the evaporation loss test remains applicable where the governing specification requires it.

Building and Waterproofing Asphalt

Road and building bitumens used in roofing felts, waterproofing membranes, and coatings are routinely tested for loss on heating, since excessive volatilization directly affects product durability and mass stability in service.

Sample Requirements

  • The sample must be homogeneous and free of water and visible impurities; wet samples should be gently dehydrated before testing.
  • A sufficient quantity (typically 60–70 g) is required to provide the 50 g test specimen plus allowance for handling losses.
  • The sample container must be labeled with source, grade, batch number, and sampling date to ensure traceability.

Testing Items

The core outputs of the asphalt evaporation loss test are the mass change after heating and the consistency of the residue. Commonly reported testing items include:

  • Evaporation loss (mass loss on heating), expressed as a percentage of the original mass
  • Penetration of the evaporation residue at 25°C, 100 g, 5 s, expressed in 0.1 mm units
  • Penetration ratio after evaporation (retained penetration), expressed as a percentage of the original penetration
  • Optional characterization of the residue: softening point, ductility, and viscosity

Testing Methods

Apparatus

  • A ventilated oven (natural or forced convection) equipped with a circular rotating shelf turning at approximately 5–6 r/min and capable of maintaining 163°C ± 1°C
  • Metal sample dishes, flat-bottomed, with an inside diameter of 55 mm and a depth of 35 mm
  • An analytical balance with a readability of 0.001 g
  • A calibrated thermometer covering the range of about 155–170°C with 0.5°C graduations
  • A desiccator for cooling, plus a penetration apparatus and 25°C water bath when the residue is to be tested

Specimen Preparation

Heat the asphalt sample slowly with occasional stirring until it becomes sufficiently fluid, taking care to avoid local overheating, bubbling, or the loss of light components. Pour 50 g ± 0.5 g of the molten sample into a clean, dry, pre-weighed dish, taking care to keep the specimen free of trapped air.

Test Procedure

  • Allow the filled dish to cool in a desiccator for 30 minutes, then weigh it to the nearest 0.001 g and record the mass (m1).
  • Bring the oven to a stable 163°C ± 1°C with the turntable rotating, and place the dish at the center of the rotating shelf.
  • Start timing once the oven temperature recovers to 163°C, and maintain heating for 5 hours with a tolerance of ±5 minutes.
  • Remove the dish, cool it in a desiccator for 30 minutes, and weigh it again to obtain the mass after heating (m2).
  • If the residue penetration is required, gently reheat the residue only until fluid, pour it into a penetration dish, condition it in a 25°C water bath for the specified period, and perform the standard penetration test under identical conditions to those used for the original binder.

Calculation and Reporting

The evaporation loss is calculated as: Loss (%) = (m1 − m2) / m1 × 100, where m1 is the mass before heating and m2 is the mass after heating. A negative value indicates a mass gain, which can occur when oxidative uptake exceeds volatilization, particularly in some polymer-modified or rubber-containing binders. The penetration ratio is calculated as: Penetration ratio (%) = (penetration of residue / penetration of original binder) × 100. The report should state the test temperature and duration, the mass change to the nearest 0.01%, the residue penetration, the penetration ratio, and full sample identification.

Typical Acceptance Criteria

Requirements vary by product specification and binder grade. For paving-grade asphalt, penetration ratios after the evaporation or thin-film oven test commonly fall in the range of 57% to 63% as minimum limits, and mass loss is generally limited to about 1.0% (sometimes expressed as a maximum of ±1.0% mass change). The exact limits must always be taken from the governing project specification or product standard.

Applications

The asphalt evaporation loss test is widely applied across the road construction and building materials industries:

  • Quality control at refineries, storage terminals, and mixing plants to verify binder consistency before use
  • Acceptance testing of delivered asphalt for highway, airport, and municipal pavement projects
  • Evaluation of aging resistance when comparing different crude sources, production processes, or binder grades
  • Assessment of anti-aging additives, warm-mix technologies, and polymer modification systems in research and development
  • Compliance verification for building and waterproofing bitumens used in roofing and membrane products
  • Educational and research use in pavement engineering laboratories studying binder rheology and durability

FAQ

What is the difference between the evaporation loss test, TFOT, and RTFOT?

All three simulate short-term construction aging, but the evaporation loss test uses a static 50 g specimen in a dish, the TFOT uses a thinner 3.2 mm film in a similar oven, and the RTFOT rolls 35 g bottles so that fresh film surfaces are continuously exposed to air. The RTFOT is generally the most severe of the three and is preferred for modified binders.

Why are 163°C and five hours used?

These conditions were established to reproduce the typical temperature and time exposure of asphalt during hot-mix production, hauling, and placement. They represent a standardized, repeatable simulation of short-term aging rather than any single field condition.

What does a large mass loss indicate?

A large mass loss indicates a high content of volatile fractions, which implies greater binder hardening, increased embrittlement risk, potential smoke and environmental emissions during construction, and reduced long-term durability of the pavement.

Can a negative mass loss (mass gain) occur?

Yes. Some binders, especially those modified with polymers or crumb rubber, absorb oxygen during heating at a rate that exceeds the evaporation of light components, producing a measurable mass gain. This is why specifications often express the limit as a mass change of no more than ±1.0%.

Where can this test be performed?

The test can be performed in any well-equipped pavement laboratory, including accredited third-party laboratories, highway quality supervision institutes, and refinery or contractor quality control facilities, provided the apparatus is calibrated and the procedure follows the designated standard.

Why Choose ZKGX?

  • State-of-the-art analytical equipment
  • Highly qualified scientific team
  • Fast turnaround time
  • Competitive pricing